Something is Going On By 
        HENRY P. RALEIGH YEARS 
        AGO THERE was an old time journalist who idly began collecting odd 
        newspaper fillers, particularly the kind that pop up in country 
        publications. You know, thinks like, ìMan grows turnip resembling 
        Marilyn Monroeî. The journalist, Charles Forte by name, soon noticed 
        a curious pattern in these reports. A large proportion were sightings 
        of bizarre rainfalls — frogs, snails, red hail, chunks of 
        meat. He observed, of course, the scientific explanations fro such 
        events — an errant tornado had sucked up the contents of a 
        pond and dumped it some distance away.
         Mr. 
        Forte was not satisfied with this reasoning and asked, in the case of 
        frog rain, the most frequent of the episodes, why the picky wind had 
        left behind all the other usual ingredients found in rural bodies of 
        water: assorted fish, old tires, lizards, rusty cans. Claiming that 
        it made a good deal more sense, Mr. Forte ventured that it was an alien 
        cargo ship in outer space, which found itself in trouble and was compelled 
        to lighten the ship by unloading its freight of frogs. Offering similar 
        reasons for these events, he published them. From this there formed 
        a loose organization of interested people, myself once included, called 
        the Fortean Society who happily followed his career. The Society may 
        yet exist; I donít know.
         Now 
        I relate Mr. Forteís former activity because I, too, observe that something 
        is going on — if not bizarre, it at least gives pause for thought. 
        Like Mr. Forte Iíve begun collecting and storing odd bits of seemingly 
        unrelated events. And Iíve found a pattern emerging.
           What 
        first caught my attention was the catalog introduction to this yearís 
        Whitney Biennial. This showís rather arid appearance was characterized 
        by its curators as ëLessnessí, a term once used by Samuel Beckett in 
        describing his work — a writer I imagined who would be unfamiliar 
        to anyone under the age of sixty yet the two curators were no more than 
        thirty-two.
         This 
        might have gone unnoticed except I subsequently ran across a piece in 
        the community news of my local newspaper. A young woman of the region 
        who attends New York Universityís film school was attempting to hold 
        a funding event to support her proposed thesis project — a film 
        about two homeless men who live in Central Park inspired by Beckettís Waiting for Godot. Then, to my utter surprise, I learned from 
        my last born, also an aspiring filmmaker, that his thesis project 
        is loaded with Beckett-style dialogue, throwing it into a filmic melding 
        of the narrative styles of Bergman, Fellini, and B¸nel, all of this 
        played out amid the gloomy, surreal graphic settings of the Russian 
        director, Andrei Tarkovsky. This from a fellow who, as far as I know, 
        had spent his entire adolescence playing Dungeons and Dragons.
         Maybe 
        these are no more than random, isolated incidents but how to account 
        for the recent art house revivals of Alain Resnaisí 1961 ìLast Year 
        at Marienbadî and Jean Luc Godardís 1963 ìContemptî with Agnes Vardaís 
        1962 ìCleo from Five to Sevenî rumored to come up next? And have you 
        noted that ìLíAvventuraî and ìThe Discreet Charms of the Bourgeoiseî 
        have been bouncing from one cable film channel to another replacing 
        an exhausting run of ìThe Umbrellas of Cherbourgî and ìJules and Jimî? 
        Even ìAeon Fluxî couldnít command as many encores as any one of these 
        — although it tried hard enough.
         Where 
        is all this 60ís stuff coming from? Surely, I thought, the end of it 
        came with Bertolucciís 1972 ìLast Tango in Parisî. Didnít we have enough 
        of Marlon Brando and Maria Schneider introspecting until the cows came 
        home? Has this younger generation become so blasÈ with our perfectly 
        good film fare of sex, slaughter and toilet humor that it yearns to 
        roll around in that old European existential malaise —the ennui, 
        angst, emotional lassitude and endless talking — oh, so much talking? 
        Do they really want to know what lifeís boredom is all about? Are these 
        young filmmakers going to be the next Roemers, Malles, Truffauts knocking 
        out films to remind us how empty and vapid we are?
         Well, 
        Iíll tell you, if thatís the way itís going I might just get in on it. 
        After all, I am a living relic of that era and perfectly prepared to 
        write a film script for either Soren Kierkegaardís Fear and Trembling or Albert Camusí The Myth of Sisyphus. A four-hour film should 
        do it, I figure — maybe Leonardo di Caprio playing Sisyphus eternally 
        pushing that olí boulder up the hill. I bet I can get my last born to 
        direct — should be right up his alley.
          |